Using some kind of mixing-length (MLT) prescription for describing convection in 1D stellar models, both and a convective velocity come out of the procedure. These can of course be combined with some assumptions to give a turbulent pressure. Below I list some points to bear in mind when doing so:
where is a form factor related to the velocity distribution function. From Fig.2 we see that this formfactor is not a constant but varies between 1.3 at the transition from convective to radiative energy transport at z = 0 to 1.9 in the bottom of the simulation. The latter though, might be a aboundary effect making 1.8 (at z=0.7) the upper limit to .
So all the dramatic changes in broadness and asymmetry, overshoot and possible double peakedness all seem to happen close to the top of the convection zone, - also the only region where ever gets important. The -ratio, peaks with 13% at z=0.1 Mm, decaying about three times faster in the overshoot region as compared to the convective zone. At the bottom of the box the turbulent pressure only contributes with 0.1% of the total pressure. It is, though, my experience and impression that 1D turbulent pressures derived from MLT convective velocities are sensible for depths greater than about 1-1.5 Mm, but this might depend on the precise MLT formulation.
Last updated [an error occurred while processing this directive] by: trampedach@pa.msu.edu.